Customer Satisfaction Survey

The State Personnel Board consistently seeks to improve the performance of its staff, hearing officers and the process of conducting business. Your evaluation of our services will be used to identify areas in which we can improve. Thank you for your assistance in helping us serve you better.

 

0 - 5 Rating: 5 = excellent; 4 = good; 3 = average; 2 = fair; 1=poor; 0 = no opinion/not applicable

I. PERSONNEL BOARD STAFF
Our staff would like to know about your interactions with us.
II. HEARING PROCESS
If your case went to hearing, please help us by answering the following questions. Please avoid any favorable or unfavorable bias based on the outcome of the proceeding in which you have been involved.
III. OVERALL PROCESS

Notice of Quorum Present

Welcome

MISSION STATEMENT

To provide an efficient and impartial hearing process while carrying out the State Personnel Board’s statutory mandate to hear and review disciplinary appeals and whistleblower complaints filed by covered state employees, former state employees, and other individuals referenced in statute.

WHAT WE DO

The State Personnel Board is responsible for hearing and reviewing, via an administrative hearing process, appeals filed by covered state employees who have been dismissed from covered state service, suspended for more than 80 working hours, or involuntarily demoted resulting from disciplinary action. The State Personnel Board also hears and reviews complaints filed under the whistleblower statute. Under the direction of the presiding hearing officer, the proceedings are conducted on an informal basis through the taking of direct testimony, the cross examination of witnesses, and the admission of evidence. A record of the proceedings is taken and made available, upon request, to hearing officers, board members, and parties to the appeal. The hearing officer determines the facts based on the evidence presented and makes a recommendation regarding discipline to the State Personnel Board. Board members are subsequently provided with case information so they may determine whether the proper level of discipline has been imposed.